Timeline for Spurious Edits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2016 at 12:45 | comment | added | pchittum | I would argue that in most of cases making a post "pretty" is actually improving it. Having properly formatting helps the reader, and furthers to overall goal of StackExchange to be a community-sourced site for excellent help articles. To accept or reject is a gut feeling sometimes. Based on your description, I would have accepted it. | |
| Feb 24, 2016 at 10:13 | comment | added | Dan Jones | Completely agree with editing for formatting code. It's amazing how a grey box, different font can turn a post from "making my eyes bleed" to being nice and readable. :) | |
| Feb 23, 2016 at 16:34 | comment | added | Sebastian Kessel | I like it. Sounds like a good course of action | |
| Feb 23, 2016 at 16:33 | history | edited | Sebastian Kessel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 211 characters in body
|
| Feb 23, 2016 at 16:33 | comment | added | Adrian Larson Mod | Definitely feel free to reject if there is no improvement posed by the edit. As Poet mentioned, we should make sure they are worthwhile. Yes readability is important and I usually accept those too. | |
| Feb 23, 2016 at 16:32 | history | answered | Sebastian Kessel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |