Of all the candidates with a reasonably guess-able gender, only one was a woman. Of the finalists, none are.

Why is that?

It feels like it's important to recognize what barriers there are to having women as moderators (or users), and how we can remove them. The salesforce ecosystem is much more diverse than the candidate slate has been, so there is clearly a bias.

What barriers are driving this unrepresentative demographic breakdown of our moderators?

  • I suspect it is because this site unlike much of the SF ecosystem is still a bit less diverse than it could be.
    – Dave Humm
    Mar 27, 2019 at 17:25
  • Every site on the Stackexchange network in some ways draws part of its audience from stack overflow. Stack overflow is purportedly 93% male.
    – Magisch
    Mar 28, 2019 at 6:11
  • 4
    Just for reference for (current) 2019 election: there are 626 users who were eligible to nominate, and who have accessed the site (not necessary the election page) since the election started. Out of them, we don't know how many have accessed the election page at least once. I haven't had a chance to guesstimate how many users from the eligible candidates are woman or not...
    – Andrew T.
    Mar 28, 2019 at 7:59

1 Answer 1


Focusing on the small group of moderators♦ can be misleading in the way that small samples (4 users) are hardly ever representative of anything. This site is mostly moderated by regular users, as the statistics in 2018: a year in moderation show: for example, moderators♦ closed 181 questions last year, while the rest of users closed 3,123. As is often said, Stack Exchange sites are moderated by you (any user who earns reputation through participation).

Anyone with 500 reputation can access review queues, where the bulk of user-moderation activities take place. With that in mind, let's look at the users who completed at least 1000 review tasks of some kind: they have earned the Steward badge.

  • Derek F
  • David Reed
  • glls
  • Reshma
  • Dave Humm
  • Oleksandr Berehovskyi
  • Adrian Larson
  • Brian Mansfield
  • Tushar Sharma
  • Raul
  • SF_user
  • battery.cord
  • Martin Lezer
  • SE_User
  • RCS
  • Himanshu
  • martin
  • Santanu Boral
  • Sebastian Kessel
  • superfell
  • Vigneshwaran G
  • Boris Bachovski
  • Eric
  • Ratan Paul
  • Mohith Shrivastava
  • Chris Duncombe
  • crmprogdev
  • Vamsi Krishna
  • Jenny B
  • Boris Bachovski
  • Samuel De Rycke
  • Sergej Utko

(The badge page linked above also has user pictures in case someone wants to guess user gender based on those.) It seems to me that the demographics of moderator♦ candidates reflects the demographics of the part of user population who are active in moderation. Which makes sense: if someone is not using moderation tools they already have (review queue buttons), why should they be given more tools?

My conclusion is that looking for bias or barriers put up at the time of moderator election is not going to be productive: the demographic balance is already lacking in the pool of viable moderator candidates.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .