Episode #125 of the Stack Overflow podcast is here. We talk Tilde Club and mechanical keyboards. Listen now
3 replaced http://meta.stackexchange.com/ with https://meta.stackexchange.com/
source | link

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me. This meta questionThis meta question appears to agree that we should generally encourage multiple answers if the question warrants it.

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me. This meta question appears to agree that we should generally encourage multiple answers if the question warrants it.

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me. This meta question appears to agree that we should generally encourage multiple answers if the question warrants it.

2 added 168 characters in body
source | link

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me. This meta question appears to agree that we should generally encourage multiple answers if the question warrants it.

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me.

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me. This meta question appears to agree that we should generally encourage multiple answers if the question warrants it.

1
source | link

I usually post multiple solutions in one answer, but I believe I probably have been broken this convention once or twice. My usual reasoning has been that I don't "need" any further rep, as I'm not here for the points, I'm here to help as many people as I can; the score just follows logically. However, I believe that posting multiple answers with one solution each would solve a problem that I've noticed with multi-solution answers: if the answer is accepted, you don't know which solution the original poster decided to go with, which reduces the value of that answer for future visitors. I believe that the site would benefit from a one-solution-per-answer policy, and it's one that I would adopt for future answers if the community agrees with me.